Sunday, 4 November 2012
Alexandre Marcel, vice-president of the Comité Idaho, an NGO that organises the international day against homophobia and transphobia, confirmed that he had filed a complaint against X on Saturday, following an attack on Friday night while he was in "Cud", a gay club in the Marais district of Paris.

"At 2:30 in the morning I came out of a bar to smoke a cigarette with my companion when five guys arrived and started hitting the bouncers. They said: "On the Koran, we're going to kill you, bunch of peds!", he recalls. "I wanted to go back into the club. One of the bouncers, who was bleeding badly, told me to call the police," he goes on. "One of the attackers saw me calling, and sprayed me with tear-gas on the face," he added.

In total, three bouncers received blows, and himself, his companion and some clients of the bar were sprayed with tear gas, explains Alexander Marcel. "My eyes and skin don't burn as much, but I am coughing and spitting a lot more," he recalls, 16 houts after the facts. "The worst thing is that the bouncers told me that they weren't going to file a complaint because they wouldn't be found anyway," he says with regret.
Source: 20Minutes.fr

30 comments:

Anonymous said...

As a Christian gay man (but not political about it nor demanding gay marriage rights) this concerns me but how do you feel about homosexuals Cheradenine Zakalwe?

daithikent said...

I like visiting and staying in the Marais district when in Paris. Seems next time I may have to go with greater awareness of the threat posed. Sad really, bit rich of the aggressors to label queers as 'peds' and threatening to kill considering their crimes against children of their own and other cultures!

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

"As a Christian gay man (but not political about it nor demanding gay marriage rights) this concerns me but how do you feel about homosexuals Cheradenine Zakalwe?"

I think they are gay.

Anonymous said...

I am catholic i do not hate gays but I feel sorry for them. Thats the difference between catholism and islam. I also oppose gay marriage. But what the muslims do to them is completely wrong.

Lord Crusader said...

How long do you think it will be until muslims become a majortity in france? If you know?

Lord Crusader said...

is this video true?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=pKcMM_uyFHM

Columnist said...

Learning Arabic is absolutely central to any attempt to roll back Islam.

Anonymous said...

"I think they are gay."

That's a rather glib response Mr Zakalwe. I mean how do you feel towards them, either disgust, acceptance, tolerance, animosity, contempt or any of a number of different human emotions.

Once the muslim threat is dealt with (and I do believe it's the greatest threat facing Western civilisation) are gays next on the list? Do you perceive us as a threat? Do you believe society would be better off without us?

Anonymous said...

I think your a bit sensitive man. Why would an anti gay individual post how Muslims beat gays up. An anti gay individual would not have posted this. And his response to the question "I think they are gay" to me means he is more of a live let live type. You seem like the type that wants to play victim and start trouble. Your kind of like the black student in school that gets caught red handed vandalizing school property and the screams racism. You need to take that chip off your shoulder and quite being paranoid.

alas said...

To anonymous 16.45.

I disagree somewhat with your characterization of the previous post. If I were gay I would also want to know what the anti-European genocide feels towards gay people. It is not as if traditionally those who are on this side have been the most tolerant towards gay people now is it. I do agree though, I take it from the posting CZ is not anti-gay. Also, from personal experience, the younger generations of racially aware people are quite tolerant towards gay people.

Anonymous said...

I believe it's rooted to the fact that it'll take another generation or two, till the world "gay" stops being a swearword. It's funny, because even my gay friends use it this way. Yeah... I'm a fruit-bat. (Not fruit-fly!).

No, gays aren't next. One of the greatest things Europe had achieved is tolerance towards GLBTs, and Islamic takeover will take this issue back to the stone age, as it done with women's rights. I strongly belive that whoever is into ploralism,gay rights, women's right and so on, should be wary of the creeping Islamic monster more than anyone else.


In reply to @Anonymous said...
"I think they are gay."

That's a rather glib response Mr Zakalwe. I mean how do you feel towards them, either disgust, acceptance, tolerance, animosity, contempt or any of a number of different human emotions.

Once the muslim threat is dealt with (and I do believe it's the greatest threat facing Western civilisation) are gays next on the list? Do you perceive us as a threat? Do you believe society would be better off without us?

Reality Check said...

Did the gays of Paris vote for Hollande? You bet they did. Gay marriage is very important to gays, some gays don't care, but the majority make it the issue. Same thing in America. Gays voted overwhelmingly for Obama despite his blatant islamophilia.

Anonymous said...

Gays. Democrats and Socialists are your worst enemies.

Anonymous said...

I think CZ's answer sums it up. "I think they're gay". That's it. A neutral answer.

Gays should firstly and lastly be concerned about the existing threat which you see in areas wherever totalitarians are intent on installing sharia. Failing to notice the message from these totalitarians will in the end lead to more difficult conditions not only for the gays, but also for the rest of the native populations.

Anonymous said...

I have no chip on my shoulder, I've never played the victim card and I despise militant gays, what I term homosexualists (just as political/radical muslims are often called islamists by the media).

I was merely curious. If CZ had said he didn't particularly care for gays then I'd respect his answer and continue following this blog, which I have been following for some time now because it's an excellent resource for anglophone Europeans.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

What I think about homosexuals really doesn't matter. The obsessive search for malign motivations is part of what's wrong with this whole era. What matters is the objective realm, where facts can be demonstrated and verified, not the subjective realm, where there can only be endless supposition.

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately it does matter because, as I'm sure you've noticed, most of humanity is subjective and feels their way blindly through issues relying mostly on instinct; every action is distorted and viewed through the prism of individual, subjective experience. Those lucky ones who are objective and can make their way without the need for emotion but instead on cold, objective facts, are a tiny minority.

Regardless, I was just curious. I didn't see any malignancy in this post (ie I didn't believe you posted it to gloat but as usual to inform) but because of the issue it related to thought it an on topic place to ask my (apparently) highly charged question. That's it, no more nor less.

I've commented on many of your posts, this is the first time I've raised this spectre. I apologise if it has made you feel uncomfortable and defensive. I'll refrain from mentioning it further in future and instead post as I normally do.

Thanks for responding.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

It hasn't made me feel defensive or uncomfortable at all. I have no more feelings about homosexuals than I do about stamp collectors. What I am heartily sick of is people still obsessed with Adolf Hitler almost 70 years after he died, who insist on viewing all contemporary politics and political activists through the absurd prism of potential Hitlers waiting to re-emerge. That's what was implicit in your question.

farenheit211 said...

Columnist said that learning Arabic was the key to understanding the threat of Islam.

I believe that learning about Islam in general and why it is a threat is also a key action.

Also telling those who may only have had the mulikulti rubbish fed to them regarding Islam is also vital. It will lose you friends, it will get you called 'racist', it will get you called other horrible names, it may even get you arrested, but it absolutely needs to be done. Islam = violence and oppression, the type of which our great grandparents and our grandparents generations fought against.

Anonymous said...

There was nothing implicit in my question other than what I asked.

I know Hitler and Mussolini were left-wing (or in the case of Il Duce, Marxist) socialists. I don't believe in the "Far-Right" just the Right.

For someone so objective you make a lot of subjective assumptions. I'm not a typical, climate change believing, tree hugging, effete homosexual; I'm pro-Israel, religious, etc.

I still fail to see where Hitler came into all of this... Hitler was the last thing on my mind when I asked my question and yet he's in the forefront of yours?

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

If not for Hitler, why raise the issue at all? There is not a word on this website that could lead any reasonable person to conclude or even suspect that I harboured any prejudice against homosexuals. The only thing that could lead to that suspicion would be a thought process that goes something like this: doesn't like Muslims - Muslims have brown skin - racist - Hitler - Hitler didn't like homosexuals.

Do you walk into the butcher's shop and buy a pound of mince then, while you're paying for it at the counter, say, "Oh, and by the way, how do you feel about homosexuals?"

Anonymous said...

Good lord, I just asked a simple question. Xrysi Avgi are anti-colonisation and yet they're also virulently homophobic.

You link to articles regarding homosexuality without commentary sometimes, I then read the articles and try to fathom your personal stance on homosexuals. If you don't have one that's great, I don't either. I didn't conclude nor suspect that you harboured any prejudice against homos, hence my question as I've said yet again. If I'm ignorant of something I often seek clarification, this time is no exception.

What does it matter your views on gays? You run a counter-jihad blog, it's nice to get a feel for what counter-jihadis feel about other issues whether economic or social.

Hitler publicly didn't like homos but he had plenty of fags in the Nazi hierarchy.

That was quite a leap of "logic" to get from doesn't like muslims to Hitler, especially since Hitler loved Islam and had a battalion made up of Bosniaks.

If it's any consolation I'm often referred to as a nazi or reactionary (even homophobe once) or label du jour for my islamorealism and desire to preserve European nationality and culture.

daithikent said...

Nazi 'fags' were mainly the Brown Shirts is that right?? Bit Freudian one could say! The Hugo Boss black dressed chaps were aesthetically better looking!

Anonymous said...

CZ says

"Do you walk into the butcher's shop and buy a pound of mince then, while you're paying for it at the counter, say, "Oh, and by the way, how do you feel about homosexuals?""

Very good point, CZ:)
- Agreeing with you all the way.

The other funny thing is that if the gay went to the halal butcher's, considering the practice they get from cutting the throats of animals, it might be wise to get things cleared up in advance, and maybe stay away from such butchers.


@Gay Anon
"I've commented on many of your posts, this is the first time I've raised this spectre. I apologise if it has made you feel uncomfortable and defensive. I'll refrain from mentioning it further in future and instead post as I normally do."

- Very well! I would put on your count, though, that as a gay you will very likely feel extra vulnerable in society, as you may have from the beginning of realizing that you were gay. Vulnerability raises more concerns. In this case, however, I do think there is no reason to raise any question about Cheradenine's intentions, whatsoever. On the contrary, I find it totally irrelevant, and CZ has explained this very clearly.

I hope you can lay aside any worries, and appreciate this blog as the excellent blog that it is, and as well appreciate Cheradenine for his excellent work and qualities!

Thank you, Cheradenine!

Anonymous said...

@CZ

This is quite alarming, isn't it?

Mayor Xavier Lemoine, has been warned by islamists, about the demographic tipping point in France. 2014 will be passed with French majority, but 2020 will be a different question

http://www.fdesouche.com/331262-xavier-lemoine-les-islamistes-mont-averti-en-2020-nous-serons-majoritaires

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

Yes, I listened to his interview on the radio. I might post about it later. I made a post about him before in which he said some of the same things. See here.

Columnist said...

Most whites do not know that Muslims consider whites and pedophiles more or less the same.

This might become a self-fulfilling prophecy. A demagogue could promise non-Muslim pederasts Muslim boys, and procure the support of certain parts of the Left.

Anonymous said...

What a twisted -religion Islam is -they don;t like women,they are promised 72-virgins ? in paradise,they have their -bazar boys'-poor little boys they steal from the streets- they use and abuse -dress them as girls-and they rape and groom -girls from other cultures-for sex -hypocryites.

Roni said...

In the name of the Koran, Muslims are about to mass murder, mass rape, lute and wipe out whole folk groups on their way to defeat Europe and take over. Sounds familiar? Remind you the Nazis? Well. The Muslims are familiar with those measures. On their way to hegemony, their religious ancient ‘Mein Kampf’, named Koran, is calling them ‘zum Befehl’ to do so. In the name of their Führer ‘Mister Allah’, who is as mental sick and blood thirsty as his earthy German Amigo, they are behaving like rabies dogs (Winston Churchill out of the ‘River War’). Mental sick is also today’s European leadership and European main-stream media. In the name of fake humanity, ‘brotherhood of man’ and ‘Cultural Marxist dogma’s’, millions more of those sick dangerous people are allowed into the continent. Muslim refugees, asylum seekers and what so ever are enjoying a warm welcome; even if they start directly after the ‘touch down’ in Arlanda or Schiphol with criminal activities and rape. EU leaders are not willing to defend their own folks from the rising danger of Islam. They see the European victims as victims of misunderstanding between two cultures. Like their former friend Neville Chamberlain (1938) they are looking for appeasement. Question is: who’s more dangerous for our future: the threat of Islam? Or the appeasers who give Islam a free hand?

Marlene Wilkins said...

I'm Bisexual myself, and both Husband and I have Gay friends we treasure.
Attack them for their sexual polarity, and Husband is the type to ensure the attack gets stopped--with a horrible Finality.
Where we live muzzies are constantly harrassing Gays, and maybe it's time some were tossed under passing traffic as a lesson to the rest of the koran-reading slagwits that attacking people for their sexual preferences is Not Done.

Diversity Macht Frei

Iostream

Share It

Search

Loading...

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Total Pageviews